Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
If the email is registered with our site, you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Password reset link sent to:
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

oh baby  

rm_mazandbren 52M/50F
139 posts
3/3/2009 12:21 am
oh baby


Let me begin by saying that I AM NOT A PAEDOPHILE. I AM NOT INTO , OKAY?
Why do the best<b> erotic photos </font></b>on the net feature ? I will be looking down a page of thumbs and the ones that make you think ‘what a great photo’ invariably feature someone who looks like they skipped school for the day. Equally invariably the pictures featuring women will be built around tits or cunt- sometimes the arse but not often. And the women themselves will be sans pubic hair. When did it become a sin to have pubic hair? Whenever I ask someone they will usually tell me that it is to make it look neater. Any guy who thinks his whole package can look good presented any way has some issues- the penis might look good but the scrotum will be the rusted out car on the front lawn of the mansion. I find the underlying reason for most women to be rid of theirs a bit more disturbing- that to be attractive to men they have to look like they’re twelve years old. I don’t know if I am overestimating the position of men or if women are underestimating them. I know which I would prefer to believe, but that can hardly carry an argument.
I like a good photograph. It does not necessarily have to be by a professional- I like Man Ray and Helmut Newton but I don’t really go in for the name when I view an exhibition; and some of the photos on the profiles on this site and others like it are exceptional. While I don’t really go in for the landscapes as such I generally like a good cityscape, especially if it is black and white. I think that black and white relies more on the skill of the photographer than the technology available, which will give you a picture with a more personalised feel to it. Portraits in colour or black and white are a little too stark unless the person has some sort of feature that becomes the focus of the photo- eyes usually suck me in but a nice pouty pair of lips are pretty good too. But I think that it is the pose that really proves the artist. Most of the poses on the internet show no artistic merit at all, which is fine because it is supposed to be porn, but why does it mean that most of the artistic work seems to involve teenagers?

In truth is there no beauty?

I am not in love; but i am open to persuasion.


rm_radikalnob 45M

3/3/2009 5:54 am

Maybe because they assume that is when we look our best. Not that it is correct but 'popular' culture has no boundaries.... whether it is music, tv, movies or even artistic porn.....


Become a member to create a blog