Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > PacificEros > BeyondConfession |
Natural (i.e., uncut) cocks vs. cut: Why would anyone prefer a cut cock (besides religious belief)?
|
Natural (i.e., uncut) cocks vs. cut: Why would anyone prefer a cut cock (besides religious belief)? Time and again, I see profiles with women or couples expressing a preference for a man with a cut cock. I'm curious: What is the reason for this preference? Is it religious, aesthetic, or something about hygiene or health safety? I have a natural cock, and you will not offend me at all if you explain your preference for a cut cock, but those who do prefer a cut cock make me curious. What if they lived in some other countries outside of the USA where natural is the norm? For me, circumcision, except for religious reasons, makes little or no sense. I see it as unnecessary surgery. I also see it as something of a conspiracy of a culture to make it harder for boys and men to masturbate. The foreskin provides a wonderful natural lubricant for masturbation and manual play. The "aesthetic" reason also confuses me, as a natural cock, when erect, looks no different than a cut cock. And keeping a natural cock clean is as easy as washing one's hands. Note: I've decided to add a photo of a natural cock just to reveal how and why there is no apparent different between a natural cock and a cut cock when the natural cock is erect.  |
||||
|
I dont rember when they cut mine, but it took 9 months for me walk after
| |||
2/1/2010 11:29 am |
There's nothing sexy about this....  Yes, sexy is in the eye of the beholder. The eye of the beholder, however, always view things through the lens of a culture and its values...and preferences...and prejudices. So if you prefer cocks surgically cut for cosmetic purposes, go for it. You are fortunate you don't live in a country where natural cocks are in the large majority.
| |||
2/1/2010 11:22 am |
But I do think there's something sexy about this.
| |||
|
There's nothing sexy about this....
| |||
1/27/2010 9:34 pm |
I'll take either! I can find beauty in both. I'm sad that circumsicion is still practised, but I'm sure that will change in time. After all, why mutilate a perfectly good cock? if you're so inclined to visit my blog.. read my fantasies, real and imagined, plus general griping and musing of an often horny, restless gal who gleefully wastes far too much time thinking up naughty things to do and see... funkyadri
| |||
1/26/2010 5:16 pm |
I believe you're just trying to force your argument...and that's fine because it's your blog. People have differing opinions and preferences. To the point you make, if you didn't like some natural feature of mine then I would be ok with that. You know why?? Because everyone doesn't like everything. Nor do I expect them to. To the other point you make, yes, if I lived in a European country where the norm is uncut, then I still wouldn't like the way they look. More women in the USA prefer a cut cock to a natural cock? Why is that? Does culture and tradition have anything to do with it? Do you recognize that standards of beauty often have a cultural basis and that what is considered beautiful or attractive has varied from time and place? For me, the negative attitude towards natural cocks comes from an American cultural bias....or a product of being most comfortable with the norm or the majority. Some people in the USA prefer white skin to black skin, finding white skin more beautiful. For me, that judgment is infected with prejudice or a bias in favor of the majority. For me, it is something similar with natural cock vs. cut cock. The natural cock is in the minority, and I see opposition to it as rooted in cultural prejudice. Yes, I am more than willing to argue my side of the case and challenge those who think differently...as I like challenging people to think more deeply about their judgments and see an issue from a different point of view.
| |||
|
I believe you're just trying to force your argument...and that's fine because it's your blog. People have differing opinions and preferences. To the point you make, if you didn't like some natural feature of mine then I would be ok with that. You know why?? Because everyone doesn't like everything. Nor do I expect them to. To the other point you make, yes, if I lived in a European country where the norm is uncut, then I still wouldn't like the way they look.
| |||
1/26/2010 5:58 am |
Cut gets my vote. Much neater and tidier. No need to hold back the skin when giving a BJ. Such pumping is even easier to do with a natural cock as the foreskin provides a natural form of lubrication (no need for saliva). I love it when a woman combines manual play with a blowjob.
| |||
1/26/2010 4:50 am |
I don't have a preference as long as the man has good hygiene. My Israeli lover's penis is cut, because of his religious background. And, the first lover I had after my divorce,a cuban, is uncut. To me, both were beautiful... I have seen pics of yours and it is also very beautiful too. Inteligencia=erotismo 
| |||
1/25/2010 9:45 pm |
Cut gets my vote as well.... Aesthetic, while a "natural" cock when erect may look no different than a cut cock... it certainly looks different when not erect. Plain and simple, I don't like the way uncut cocks look. Yes, we are free to have our opinions, but I feel some opinions are problematical, indeed prejudiced. Imagine if you lived in a European country where most men have natural cocks. Do you think you would then say, "I don't like the way it looks"? For me, a bias against the natural cock is too often a narrow-minded cultural bias. Yes, people have nose jobs and boob jobs, but they are adults when they choose to undergo such surgery. But do you think I should undergo cosmetic surgery of my cock just to please the women who find a natural cock untidy or not nice looking? I love my natural cock. For one thing, it's such an advantage for masturbation. They also say that circumcision eliminates some of the sensitivity of the cock, eliminating nerve endings. By the way, why do you put natural in quotation marks. Isn't an uncircumcised cock truly a natural cock....the cock a male was born with rather than one subjected to surgery over which the baby had no choice but to undergo?
| |||
|
Cut gets my vote as well.... Aesthetic, while a "natural" cock when erect may look no different than a cut cock... it certainly looks different when not erect. Plain and simple, I don't like the way uncut cocks look.
| |||
1/25/2010 7:18 pm |
Cut gets my vote. Much neater and tidier. No need to hold back the skin when giving a BJ.
|
Become a member to create a blog
