Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > WhyWomenHateMen > Why Women Hate Men |
A Matter of Opinion.
|
A Matter of Opinion. I'm here. Why? Because I'm bored. Or really because I'm often here. I'm stalking Vixn_Vella. Did I ever mention I have a huge crush on her? Shhhhh, don't say anything. It's like one of those sixth grade crushes where I'd have to let her know about my feelings with a well thought out punch in the arm or something. Uhhhh... Anyway, post. I've almost forgotten how I used to do these.  Ladies please read I need your opinion Ladies only! I am a straight guy in every way except I have a little lingerie fetish. I need to know from the girls here if you think these photos are hot or not? No or yes to showing my cock in the photos? Too short? Too fat? Leave the lingerie to the girls? I want your opinion. If you live in Phoenix, send me an email at (REMOVED) If a male snail trail gracefully teasing its way into a pair of Costco Seniors super-absorbent lingerie doesn't motivate your ovaries to spray eggs like a hen getting crushed by a steamroller, then I'm afraid Tom's fetish might be a little out of your league. Webster's defines "fetish" as an object of fixation psychologically necessary for sexual gratification. While I can't determine whether Tom's fetish involves the silky love cape draping from his shoulders, or the delicate<b> hosiery </font></b>he hath stuffed like so many turkey-based sausage casings, I can determine that if any of us were to list our own fetishes, few of us would list "Tom". I personally don't have a problem with fetishes, but dropping your swim team directly into the pungent stronghold of musty afterthoughts created by Grandma's most recent romance novel session just seems a little obscure to me. But then again, that's coming from a guy who likes to have a baboon in a magenta leotard ride a unicycle around the bedroom playing instrumental versions of Journey hits on a military bugle. My girlfriend doesn't mind, but the baboon seems confused, and sometimes throws his feces at my strobe lights. Tom, men are turned on by women in lingerie because men find themselves sexually stimulated via visual cues. Women on the other hand do not rely on visual cues for arousal, but often find themselves more sexually stimulated by what's going on in your mind. Which unfortunately, in your case, is whether or not women feel you should free your anteater snout from the oxygen-starved confines of a sumo-wrestlers work pouch. You can put lingerie on a man, and you can put a cute little summer hat on a donkey. Both might spice things up for a moment, but in the end, you still just have an ass that no women will want to ride. See the blog here: WhyWomenHateMen |
|||
|
WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN? Damn, I've been cranky and in need of a laugh and WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN? Ogling Vixn's bazooms, no doubt. And who would blame you? 'Not I!' said the Ring. Dude. Next time you take off like that, at least leave me a little sumthin'-sumthin'.  When it comes to sex, I need a STRONG connection. Otherwise, the page just keeps buffering and takes FOREVER to load...
| ||
|
"Women on the other hand do not rely on visual cues for arousal" Sorry, I gotta call BS on that one. Plenty of women are as visual as any man. As far as the post goes - I have no problem with a guy who likes to wear lacy underthings. I've never dated one, but I would (and nearly did). But I appreciate a man who dresses well, and that goes for whether he's dressing like a man or a woman. The panties do nothing for his shape - a pair of French knickers would give good coverage and be much more flattering - and IMO stockings and suspenders require high heels, or at least low heels. I have yet to see anyone, male or female, look good in stockings and no shoes. Of course, I hate when men tell me how to dress, but we've established many a time that I can be a hypocrite. *shrug* Do not seek an external refuge, but be a light unto yourself. "Be the change you want to see." HalfNekkid Wednesday Peekaboo
| ||
|
I also call BS on women not being visual. And, there is an exception for everything. I'm not normally into the 'men in lingerie' thing, but I saw a picture over on Fetlife... (wish I could re-post it here but I'd never find it again, and I'm not into stealing pictures). The shot was from behind, the guy was wearing a garter belt with no panties, and he had a very fine ass and muscular back. There was something edgy about the photo that I can't recall, maybe he had tattoos and the nylons had some rips. I would have done that guy in a second. The guy above - not so much. You and stormy are right - he needs a little help.   
| ||
|
WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN? Damn, I've been cranky and in need of a laugh and WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN? Ogling Vixn's bazooms, no doubt. And who would blame you? 'Not I!' said the Ring. Dude. Next time you take off like that, at least leave me a little sumthin'-sumthin'. See the blog here: WhyWomenHateMen
| ||
|
"Women on the other hand do not rely on visual cues for arousal" Sorry, I gotta call BS on that one. Plenty of women are as visual as any man. As far as the post goes - I have no problem with a guy who likes to wear lacy underthings. I've never dated one, but I would (and nearly did). But I appreciate a man who dresses well, and that goes for whether he's dressing like a man or a woman. The panties do nothing for his shape - a pair of French knickers would give good coverage and be much more flattering - and IMO stockings and suspenders require high heels, or at least low heels. I have yet to see anyone, male or female, look good in stockings and no shoes. Of course, I hate when men tell me how to dress, but we've established many a time that I can be a hypocrite. *shrug* See the blog here: WhyWomenHateMen
|
Become a member to create a blog
