Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
If the email is registered with our site, you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Password reset link sent to:
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

almost 800 law professors agree  

redmustang91 64M
7763 posts
12/9/2019 3:52 pm

Last Read:
12/26/2019 2:32 am

almost 800 law professors agree


Almost 800 law profs signed a letter supporting impeachment of Trump. An excerpt:

Moreover, the Founders were keenly concerned with the possibility of corruption in the president’s relationships with foreign governments. That is why they prohibited the president from accepting anything of value from foreign governments without Congress’s consent. The same concern drove their thinking on impeachment. James Madison noted that Congress must be able to remove the president between elections lest there be no remedy if a president betrayed the public trust in dealings with foreign powers.

In light of these considerations, overwhelming evidence made public to date forces us to conclude that President Trump engaged in impeachable conduct. To mention only a few of those facts: William B. Taylor, who leads the U.S. embassy in Ukraine, testified that President Trump directed the withholding of hundreds of millions of dollars in<b> military </font></b>aid for Ukraine in its struggle against Russia — aid that Congress determined to be in the U.S. national security interest — until Ukraine announced investigations that would aid the President’s re-election campaign. Ambassador Gordon Sondland testified that the President made a White House visit for the Ukrainian president conditional on public announcement of those investigations. In a phone with the Ukrainian president, President Trump asked for a “favor” in the form of a foreign government investigation of a U.S. citizen who is his political rival. President Trump and his Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney made public statements confirming this use of governmental power to solicit investigations that would aid the President’s personal political interests. The President made clear that his private attorney, Rudy Giuliani, was central to efforts to spur Ukrainian investigations, and Mr. Giuliani confirmed that his efforts were in of President Trump’s private interests.

Ultimately, whether to impeach the President and remove him from office depends on judgments that the Constitution leaves to Congress. But if the House of Representatives impeached the President for the conduct described here and the Senate voted to remove him, they would be acting well within their constitutional powers. Whether President Trump’s conduct is classified as bribery, as a crime or misdemeanor, or as both, it is clearly impeachable under our Constitution.

redmustang91 64M
9760 posts
12/10/2019 4:12 am

Law professors know something about law, history and the U.S. Constitution. Not true about Trump.


redmustang91 64M
9760 posts
12/10/2019 4:14 am

Trump also asked China to interfere in our election process by investigating Biden.


redmustang91 64M
9760 posts
12/10/2019 4:15 am

Mulvaney said there was a political quid pro quo demanded of the Ukraine to get our assistance. He told the truth, then lied about it for exposing the reality.


redmustang91 64M
9760 posts
12/12/2019 9:06 am

Not all opinions have equal weight. Stupid comments get deleted.


Become a member to create a blog