The Contestants Review
|
Posted:Jun 22, 2015 7:13 pm
Last Updated:Apr 19, 2024 3:38 pm
2866 Views
|
Directed by David Stanley. Released by Vivid in 2004.
Three couples vie for a chance to win $6 million from an eccentric millionaire (played by Stephanie Swift) who locks them in an abandoned warehouse without food or water. The couple that successfully escapes first is the winner. The losers are to be devoured by her pet tiger. The entire concept is rather surreal. Story Grade: B-.
This movie was shot on digital video. Medium Grade: B.
The sets appeared to have been constructed at an actual location and were well dressed. The color palate enhanced the feeling of surrealism. Set Design Grade: B+.
Sexual performances were fairly average, although Holly Hollywood and Eric Masterson's scene on the scaffolding was interesting. Still, there didn't seem to be a sense of passion. Condoms were used in this production. (Condom use has no bearing on the grade.) Sex Performances Grade: C+.
Performers either overacted or underacted. Many of the line deliveries felt as if they had been read from a piece of paper rather than flowing like actual dialogue. The fight scenes and the tiger attack scenes were exceptionally phony. Acting Grade: D.
It was not really explained why all the contestants were in the same uniform (light blue t-shirts and khaki pants), but yet wore different style shoes. Stephanie Swift's look was the most interesting and also fitting for an eccentric millionaire. Wardrobe/Make-up Grade: B-.
Scenes were generally well lit, although there seemed to be some issues with the second sex scene. Lighting Grade: B.
The score during the second sex scene didn't seem to fit the tone of the movie. The sound quality was consistent throughout the movie. Sound Grade: B.
A camera appeared in one of the shots and there were times when the framing of shots was off. The initial sex scenes between each couple seemed to be unmotivated. However, only later when they realize that having sex advances them further toward escape do the scenes make sense. Briana brakes the fourth wall toward the end which was distracting. Directing Grade: C.
Some consideration was given to the surrealism of this production; however, it would have been interesting to have more of a backstory about the millionaire and how she chose the contestants. Artistic Merit Grade: B+.
OVERALL GRADE: B-.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Hollywood Ho' House Review
|
Posted:Jun 13, 2015 7:41 pm
Last Updated:Apr 19, 2024 3:38 pm
3118 Views
|
Directed by Thomas Paine. Released by VCA in 1994.
There's not much of a plot to this feature. The movie begins with Iris (played by Isis Nile) in an interrogation room with vice squad officers played by Cumisha Amato, Sahara Sands, and Jeff Scott. Iris has been caught running a ring in the motion picture industry. There are a series of flashbacks regarding the inception of the ring and her involvement in it. After he statement, she is let go and the officers all have sex. That's all folks. Story Grade: D.
This feature was shot on video. Medium Grade: C.
A mix of real locations and soundstage sets were used in this production. There was a brief outdoor pool scene. The motel set was the best-dressed, while the bathroom set was clearly phony, but nevertheless interesting and visually appealing. The same could not be said for the interrogation room set. Set Design Grade: B.
The sexual performances were generally very good, although the slow-motion cum shots in some of the scenes was probably unnecessary. Isis kept her bra on for most of her sex scene with Peter North which was disappointing. During that scene, she also briefly looked at the camera. Sex Performances Grade: B.
Acting performances by the actors playing cops were not that good. Although Isis Nile was in most of the scenes, there was actually little character development which was unfortunate since her line delivery felt authentic. Acting Grade: C+.
Given that most of the actresses were playing prostitutes, the wardrobe was suitable for that purpose. The bikini that Isis wore during her scene with Gerry Pike really stood out. Wardrobe Grade: B+.
Lighting was inconsistent and was especially noticeable during the Isis Nile/Peter North scene. Too much direct light was used, which produced unneeded shadows. Lighting Grade: C-.
The score wasn't that exceptional, but the sound quality for fair and consistent throughout the feature. Sound Grade: B-.
Some characters were performing in a sex scene before being introduced, which was a bit disorienting. There were numerous shot-framing issues and some of the scene transitions were hokey. The cum on Isis Nile and Micki Lynn magically disappeared at the beginning of their lesbian scene that immediately followed their scene with Alex Sanders and Cal Jammer. Directing Grade: D+.
Although the story was weak, there was definitely some effort put into the construction of the sets. Artistic Merit Grade: C+.
OVERALL GRADE: C.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Deep Cover Review
|
Posted:Jun 13, 2015 5:25 pm
Last Updated:Apr 19, 2024 3:38 pm
3174 Views
|
Directed by Thomas Paine. Released by Wicked Pictures in 1993.
Celeste plays an undercover C.I.A. agent who teams up with former agent John (played by Woody Long) to find the mole in the agency. It's not a bad concept, but it was poorly executed. Story Grade: D+.
This feature appears to have been shot on film, but the images weren't that sharp; perhaps that was due to a bad transfer. Medium Grade: B-.
An actual location was used for this production, rather than a soundstage. It was clear that the same property was used multiple times, given the similarity of the framed artwork in the various rooms. The car ride dialogue scene with Celeste and Woody Long was obviously fake. Set Design Grade: B.
The sexual performances were fairly energetic with Debi Diamond and Celeste being the most boisterous. Marc Wallice used in condom in his scene with Hyapatia Lee. (Condom use has no bearing on the grade.) Sexual Performances Grade: B-.
Acting performances were not that great. There was no sense of urgency to find the mole in the agency. The scene in which Woody Long falls asleep was completely phony. Marc Wallice was supposed to play a Russian agent but didn't even attempt an accent. Acting Grade: D.
Celeste didn't look much like a C.I.A. agent, regardless of her being undercover or not. There was an unexplained wardrobe change after Celeste's scene with Melanie Moore. The women mostly kept there high heels on in bed. Wardrobe/Make-Up Grade: C-.
At times, too much direct light was used, making it appear as a spotlight on the performers. However, the lightly was generally consistent. Lighting Grade: C-.
Portions of the score were great, while at other times it was simply mediocre. Sound quality was decent throughout the movie. Sound Grade: B-.
The camera work on this production was not spectacular. Shots were not steady all the time and the camera moved for no particular reason. Some sex scenes occurred before the introduction of characters in them, which was discombobulating. Directing Grade: D.
Given that this feature was shot on film demonstrates that some effort of artistic integrity was used in this production. Given that Celeste was the first-billed actress and the cover model, the story should have begun with her. Artistic Merit Grade: B-.
OVERALL GRADE: C.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Valley Vixens Review
|
Posted:Jun 12, 2015 9:19 pm
Last Updated:Apr 19, 2024 3:38 pm
3197 Views
|
Directed by Bobby Hollander. Released by Gourmet Video in 1983.
There isn't much story to this feature. The story begins with Shauna Grant talking to her husband (played by Steve Douglas) and his desire for her friend Mona (played by Mona Page) comes up. Shauna later hosts a card game with Mona and two of her other friends (Inez Acker and Cody Nicole) in attendance. Shauna's husband comes home with two of his friends (Tom Byron and Craig Roberts) and the sex scenes ensue. No real plot exists. Story Grade: F.
Shot on video, and low-quality video at that. Medium Grade: D+.
A real house was apparently used, but shots were tight, so not much of the surroundings could be seen. Set Design Grade: C-.
The sex performances were not spectacular. The scene with Tom Byron and Shauna Grant was extremely short. The cunnilingus scene with Shauna Grant and Steve Douglas was blocked by his head. The others just felt a tad phony and Mona certainly didn't look that enthused. Sexual Performances Grade: D-.
The actors used the same names as their stage names. Not a whole lot of creativity here and little character development was to be found. Tom Byron was clearly the best actor of the group. Acting Grade: D+.
Make-up was a bit too heavy on all of the women. Costumes were fairly appropriate, although shoes were kept on during some of the sex scenes. Wardrobe/Make-Up Grade: D+.
Too much direct light was used, making it obvious that the scenes were artificially lit. Lighting Grade: D+.
The sound was muffled at times and the minimal score added little to the feature. Sound Grade; D-.
Scenes were typically only shot with one angle, so there was no alternating between characters when another was speaking. At the card table scene, viewers never saw Shauna's face, even when she was talking. Zooms were sloppily done, often resulting in an unfocused image. A crew member's shadow could be seen in the Tom Byron/Shauna Grant scene. Directing Grade: F-.
Little artistic effort seems to have been put into this production. Artistic Merit Grade: F.
OVERALL GRADE: D-.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Paper Dolls Review
|
Posted:Jun 12, 2015 7:13 pm
Last Updated:Apr 19, 2024 3:38 pm
2812 Views
|
Directed by Bobby Hollander. Released by Gourmet Video in 1984.
There is no story in this movie whatsoever. It is a series of interviews with Shauna Grant, Tina Marie, Linda Shaw, and Cara Lott interspersed with masturbation and lesbian scenes. Story Grade: F-.
Shot on low-quality video, the image is very poor. The transfer was not good. Medium Grade: F.
This appeared to be shot at an actual location, but the shots were so tight that much of the set couldn't be seen. Shauna's interview was outside by a pool. Set Design Grade: D+.
Shauna Grant had a solo masturbation scene that was highly edited. Chrissy Beauchamp only masturbated in the scene with Tina Marie and Cara Lott. The lesbian scene with Tina Marie and Linda Shaw was probably the best. Sexual Performances Grade: C-.
Actresses played themselves, or at least their porn star personas. With that, most seemed pretty enthusiastic about sex. Shauna Grant seemed somewhat uncomfortable. Acting Grade: D.
Wardrobe was casual, but the girls still wore shoes during the sex scenes. Wardrobe/Make-Up Grade: C-.
Too much direct lighting was used in the lesbian scenes on the sofa. Viewers can easily tell that a spotlight is shining on them. Lighting Grade: D+.
The soundtrack was garbled early on, most likely due to the lousy transfer. What score there was was rather lame. Sound Grade: D-.
The director was apparently the man interviewing the girls. He got Shauna's name wrong twice. Chrissy Beauchamp never had an interview scene, so viewers have no idea who she is when she shows up masturbating in the final scene. During an interview, it sounds as if the Tina Marie/Linda Shaw scene is to be a poolside scene, but it ends up taking place inside on a sofa. Directing Grade: F.
An interview piece is a fine concept for a series, but not a feature. In fact, as a series it would have been helpful since as the director pointed out, porn star names are changed for whatever reason in magazine layouts. I will often wonder who the girls really are in the magazines and wonder where else I can see their work, but have nothing to go on other than a phony first name that the magazine labels the girl and is inconsistent from magazine to magazine, unless a star already has a following under a given name. Artistic Merit Grade: F.
OVERALL GRADE: D-.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Last Call Review
|
Posted:Jun 9, 2015 10:07 pm
Last Updated:Apr 19, 2024 3:38 pm
3054 Views
|
Directed by Francois Clousot. Released by Wicked Pictures in 2008.
Brad Armstrong plays Scott, a mild-mannered businessman who goes to a bar after work to meet his friend Brad (played by Randy Spears). Soon after he arrives, Teri (played by Kaylani Lei) begins hitting on him. When Brad calls to say he can't make it to the lounge to meet Scott, Scott pursues Teri. Teri takes Scott back to a warehouse loft where the two have sex. Afterwards, while Scott is in the shower, Teri absconds with Scott's wallet, phone, keys, and car. Thus begins Scott's nightmarish evening. Gradually, we learn that Scott has been a victim of an elaborate set-up and he has yet to endure more sexual escapades before the evening concludes. The concept was good, but not particularly believable. The motive for the set-up was also weak, given that it was orchestrated by someone who owed a debt, but the debtors didn't receive any financial gain from torturing Scott since his belongings are later returned to him. Story Grade: B+.
This feature was shot on high definition digital video. Medium Grade: B+.
Sets appeared to have been constructed in a warehouse and were rather sparse. The bar was not well-stocked. The lingerie shop looked phony. Something about the bedroom scene with Kaylani Lei and Brad Armstrong also seemed off. Some exterior scenes were done. Set Design Grade: B.
The sexual performances were all very good. Some of the blowjob scenes went on for too long. Condoms were used in this production. (Condom use has no bearing on the grade.) Sexual Performances Grade: A-.
While line deliveries were generally very good, the acting suffered from a lack of motivation. One major problem was that Brad Armstrong's motivation should have been focused on getting his car and belongings back, but this was watered down through the continuous sexual encounters he either participated in or watched. Acting Grade: B+.
Brad Armstrong's bruise make-up did quite match in the final scene and Kaylani Lei's hairstyle slightly changed over the course of the night. Tori Black's wacky outfit also didn't seem to fit her character Candy, who seemed to be a crazy homeless person. Wardrobe/Make-Up Grade: B.
Lighting was very good for the most part. The lingerie backroom scene had a little too much light. The visual effects that were used during the Kaylani Lei/Randy Spears scene were unnecessary and distracting. Lighting Grade: B+.
The score was also very good and felt appropriately eerie. However, the score that played during Tori Black's dialogue scenes was goofy, which may have been fitting for the character, but not for the tone of the movie. Sound Grade: B+.
A bit more realism would have been a welcome element to this picture. There were multiple things that didn't make sense. For instance, Kaylani somehow knows exactly which car is Brad's without being told. If a guy's expensive car is stolen, is he really going to care about having sex after he just already had it? Would a guy who has just been beaten want to follow a group of cloaked hooded people into a building in a sketchy neighborhood? Directing Grade: B.
The look and feel of the movie was generally excellent, with only few exceptions. How lighting was used really added to the artistry. Artistic Merit Grade: A.
OVERALL GRADE: B+.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Hump Festival Submission
|
Posted:Jun 9, 2015 5:18 pm
Last Updated:Jul 1, 2015 7:56 pm
3159 Views
|
I am attempting to assemble a creative team for a Hump Festival video submission. The deadline for submissions is September 30 and I want to make sure to have enough time to develop a quality product that will not only have a good chance of being screened, but also have a good chance at winning a prize. I am in search of a cast and crew for this project, so if you don't want to be in front of the camera, you certainly don't have to be. I have a general concept for a story, but wouldn't mind another writer with whom to collaborate. Your gender doesn't matter, nor does your sexual orientation. If you want to be a part of something extraordinary, contact me.
|
|
|
3
Comments
|
|
The Backdoor Club Review
|
Posted:Jun 7, 2015 10:31 pm
Last Updated:Apr 19, 2024 3:38 pm
3350 Views
|
Directed by Jack Remy. Released by Caballero in 1985.
While in Munich, Herschel Savage and Danielle visit a sex club called The Backdoor Club, an American tourist destination. It is much like a swingers club, with an emphasis on anal action. Not having done anal before, Danielle is leery about trying it, afraid that it will hurt. Although she watches other women do it and has a swinging good time, she opts to remain an anal virgin at the end of the movie. There unfortunately isn't much story in this movie. Story Grade: D+.
This feature was shot on video, but would have looked much better on film. Medium Grade: C.
The movie was actually shot in Munich, Germany which makes it all the more disappointing that more of the city wasn't shown and doubly unfortunately that it wasn't shot on film. A real location was used for the interior scenes Set Design Grade: A-.
Sexual performances were enthusiastic; however, Joanna Stevens did not look enthused to be there. This may be because it was her first adult feature (and perhaps her only) or because she was a native German and had to deal with language and culture barriers. Sexual Performances Grade: A-.
Since there wasn't a whole lot of character development, there wasn't a whole lot of acting. Most of the acting simply had to do with sexual activities. Bonus points for the German performers who did a pretty good job with English. Acting Grade: B.
Costumes were appropriate for the characters, although I'm not quite sure what it was that Taija Rae was wearing, come to think of it. Sandra Nova's make-up was a tad overdone for her character as a maid. Wardrobe/Make-Up Grade: B.
Some scenes were too bright and were hindered by too much direct light. The movie could have benefited from more natural or diffused light. Lighting Grade: B-.
"Slippin' In The Backdoor" seems to have been an original song composed for this movie (presumably performed by Galaxy). The dialogue spoken by Danielle and Herschel in the car wasn't in sync with the visual images. Sound Grade: B+.
It was disappointing that the city of Munich was not featured more prominently. The driving shots at the beginning of the movie are distorted with visual effects and then are obscured even further with images of the sex scenes that are to come as well as cast photos. Some of the transitions from scene to scene were a little awkward and the color seemed to be a little off at times when blacks looked like blues. This movie also would have been an excellent opportunity to educate viewers about anal sex by incorporating tips throughout the narrative given the American characters' inexperience with anal. However, it was a lost opportunity since none of the American girls even have anal sex in the movie. Directing Grade: C-.
Given that this video was shot in Munich, there was definitely an effort to make this an above-average production, but as I mentioned earlier, not enough of the city was shown. Artistic Merit Grade: B.
OVERALL GRADE: B-.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
This Is Your Sex Life Review
|
Posted:Jun 7, 2015 8:12 pm
Last Updated:Jun 7, 2015 9:52 pm
2614 Views
|
Directed by Jerome Bronson (credited as Wolfgang Gower). Released by Vidco in 1987 (copyright date). Available on Caballero Classics DVD.
A spoof of the TV series This Is Your Life, this movie stars Tracey Adams as host Holly Bedgood as she and the producers of her show find contestants to take a trip down their sexual memory lane. In this installment, Taija Rae is the contestant who is surprised in her home by a camera crew as she masturbates in the bathtub. She is then whisked away to the television studio where actors re-enact moments of her sexual history. Be sure to stay tuned for the surprise guest at the end. There isn't much story, but the concept is good. Story Grade: B.
This feature was shot on video. Medium Grade: C.
Some real locations were used, while some sets appeared to have been sets built on soundstages. The soundstages were appropriate for this production given that the concept was that it was done as a TV show in a studio. With that in mind, the scene with Mike Horner and Nina DePonca should have taken place on a soundstage rather than at a real location. Bonus for keeping the local L.A. phone number of a television audience recruiting hotline in one of the exterior shots. Set Design Grade: B+.
The sexual performances were very good. Although Tracey Adams is a main character, she does not have sex in this production. Sexual Performances Grade: A-.
The acting performances were generally believable, given that a number of the performances were portrayed as stereotypes: a first-time sexual encounter in the backseat of a car as teenagers for example. Naturally, one has to suspend disbelief in the scene at the beginning of the film in which the camera crew sneaks in on an unsuspecting Taija Rae. Acting Performances: A-.
Mike Horner in a Kermit The Frog costume. It's bizarre, but you'll see it here. Taija Rae looked great, but there was a bit too much make-up. (She wore less in her earlier films.) High heel shoes remained on in numerous sex scenes in which they would have realistically come off. Also, Mike Horner kept his frog feet on during a portion of his sex scene with Nina DePonca. Weird. Wardrobe/Make-Up Grade: B.
There was a slight lighting adjustment in the Mike Horner/Nina DePonca scene, but it was still over lit. Otherwise, lighting was consistent. Lighting Grade: B.
A slight echo could be heard in the dialogue early on in the movie, but it seemed to dissipate. The score was decent, but the audio track in the background of the Peter North/Shanna McCullough drive-in scene was a nuisance considering that the movie was supposed to be a Bogart/Bacall classic and sounded nothing like one. Sound Grade: C+.
A boom briefly appeared during the Taija Rae/Tom Byron sex scene. Also, the wide shot of the studio set seemed to be rather blurry. Directing Grade: B.
Overall, this production was a successful parody of a classic TV show. With a bigger budget, it probably could have been better. Artistic Merit Grade: B+.
OVERALL GRADE: B.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Chocolate Kisses Review
|
Posted:Jun 7, 2015 5:03 pm
Last Updated:Apr 19, 2024 3:38 pm
2483 Views
|
Directed by Jack Remy. Released in 1986. Available on i-Candy DVD.
Eunice (played by Jeannie Pepper) and Darlene (played by Purple Passion) are two street prostitutes who thought they'd be making more money having graduated from UCLA just two years earlier. They answer an ad in the classifieds for sales positions with Mr. Sloane's (played by Herschel Savage) Chocolate Kiss candy company. Sloane is in financial trouble due to poor sales, but when the concept of pussy-flavored chocolates surfaces, his fortunes turn with the help of Eunice and Darlene as his sales representatives. The story is relatively simplistic, but it was executed fairly well. Rick Savage's character as the loan officer could have been more of an adversary. Story Grade: B+.
This feature was shot on video, but would have looked better on film. Medium Grade: B-.
Real locations were used in this production as opposed to sets constructed on soundstages. There wasn't much depth shown as the shots were fairly tight. There were a few outdoor shots of Hollywood and environs which opened up the production. It could have benefited from more of that. Bonus points for showing the exterior of the See's Candies plant in Los Angeles. Set Design Grade: B+.
The sex performances were enthusiastic. One particular sex position that isn't often seen in hetero porn was the side by side two-cock blow job where the shafts are constantly touching. It wasn't particularly stimulating to me, nor did it seem to be to Buck Adams and Shone Taylor, since neither of the two performers was very hard at that moment. Still, it was a change of pace. Sexual Performances Grade: B+.
Acting performances in this production was a bit better than average. Dialogue was delivered with authenticity and the characters were fairly believable. Acting Grade: B+.
Wardrobe choices seemed to be appropriate for the characters, but nothing particularly stood out. Wardrobe/Make-Up Grade: B.
Lighting was generally consistent. Scenes were lit appropriately, although sometimes lighting was too direct. Lighting Grade: B.
The sound during the final sex scene sounded a little hollow at first. Other wise the sound quality was decent. The score felt appropriate. Sound Grade: B+.
Besides wishing that more exterior shooting was done, the director did a fine job. The denouement could have focused more on Eunice and Darlene, rather than including captions for every single character saying where the ended up. Directing Grade: B+.
Bunny Bleu and Jennifer Noxt wore special candy stripe uniforms for their jobs at the Chocolate Kiss candy factory, so there was definitely an effort put into this production. Artistic Merit Grade: B+.
OVERALL GRADE: B.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Lottery Lust Review
|
Posted:Jun 7, 2015 3:07 pm
Last Updated:Apr 19, 2024 3:38 pm
2525 Views
|
Directed by Patty Rhodes. Released by Penguin Productions in 1986. Available on EVN DVD.
Buck Adams plays a lowly accountant named Eddie who wins a million dollars from a scratch-off lottery ticket. After winning, he comes to the conclusion that everyone is becoming friendly with him because of the money. This was a good premise, but there is little emotional drama and the opening crisis with Sheila (played by Gina Carrera) and her tax audit is never resolved. Story Grade: D+.
This feature was shot on video. Medium Grade: C-.
Real locations were used for this production, but there were no outdoor scenes, making it somewhat claustrophobic. Bedrooms weren't particularly visually appealing. Set Design Grade: C.
The sexual performances were generally energetic. According to the DVD artwork, this was one of the last performances of John Holmes. The scene with Nikki Charm and Melissa Melendez was a little odd since they appeared to be taking a shower, yet no water was running and they weren't wet, save for their pussies, I suppose. Sexual Performances Grade: B+.
Buck Adams overacted his part. Renee Summers' role as a loyal maid was a little unauthentic. Jason Fox's acting was terrible. Gina Carrera's character was underdeveloped, but did a fair acting job with it. More could have been done with Nikki Charm and Melissa Melendez, and unfortunately Tracey Adams and Bunny Bleu had very little to do. Acting Grade: D+.
Although better than having her wear high heels, Nikki Charm still wore sneakers during her sex scene on a bed. The outfit that Melissa Melendez wore was nice, but was slightly inappropriate for the occasion. Wardrobe/Make-Up Grade: B-.
The lighting was much too bright and too direct, nearly bleaching out Nikki Charm's skin tone in the shower scene. Lighting Grade: D.
Although the sound quality was consistent, the sex scenes were sometimes a little too quiet without a score behind them when vocalization and moans were lacking. Early sex scenes had somewhat of a score, but it either didn't last for the whole duration, or it was very faint. Sound Grade: C-.
A boom shadow could be detected in a few of the shots and offscreen direction was heard in at least one instance. Melissa Melendez addressed the camera during her scene with Jason Fox which was jarring. The director should have made sure that the issues introduced at the beginning of the movie be resolved by the end. It would have made more sense for Buck's character to wind up with Gina Carrera since she showed an interest in him before he won the lottery money. Directing Grade: D.
There was an attempt made to tell a narrative and to perhaps include a social commentary about the things people will do for money, but it was poorly executed. Using real locations rather than soundstage sets was beneficial, but could have been exploited more. Artistic Merit Grade: C+.
OVERALL GRADE: C.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Visions Of Jeannie Review
|
Posted:Jun 7, 2015 12:54 pm
Last Updated:Jun 7, 2015 12:58 pm
2448 Views
|
Directed by Jonathan Burroughs. Released by Vidco in 1985. Available on Caballero Classics DVD.
The feature begins with a distraught Alice (played by Summer Rose) who has just lost her friend and lover Rosie (played by Tamara Longley). Her husband Robert (played by Jay Serling) tries to console her by suggesting they hire a medium named Jeannie (played by Tracey Adams) to contact Rosie from beyond. Robert also invites his friend Ken (played by Jerry Butler). Using a Ouija board, they are able to contact Rosie, but the story quickly deteriorates into a series of barely tangential sexual flashbacks. The concept had potential, but the execution was terrible. Story Grade: D.
This movie was shot on video. Medium Grade: C.
A real location was used for this production and there were a few outdoor scenes. The shots were so tight, however, that one couldn't really see much of the decor. Set Design Grade: B-.
The sexual performances were pretty good. The best scene was probably the Nikki Charm/Kevin James scene, while the worst was the Summer Rose/Jay Serling scene. Sexual Performances Grade: B.
While line delivery was generally good, actors were hindered by a poor script. Summer Rose's emotional breakdown at the beginning could have passed for authentic if it weren't for the awful dialogue she spoke. When Tracey Adams arrives with the Ouija board, she asks Summer Rose if she has a Ouija board, which was unnecessary since she brought one with her. There were also a few narrative incongruities. During the flashback with Jerry Butler and Nina Hartley, Jeannie is referenced as the "Ouija broad" when the character hadn't even been met yet. In a flashback with Jay Serling and Tracey Adams, Jay mentions that his significant other's name is Alice, which apparently is forgotten in the present when Jay tells her once again that his wife's name is Alice. There is no reference to the flashback scene. At the end, Summer Rose's character has no reaction whatsoever when her lost lover and friend reappears. Acting Grade: D.
Costumes were okay. The swimsuit worn by Nikki Charm was the most interesting since it appeared that her bikini bottoms were being held up by spiral telephone cords. The high heeled pink boots that Tamara Longley wore in the orgy scene were a little odd. It was distracting to see Nina Hartley keep her high heels on in her sex scene with Jerry Butler as was the fact that Tracey Adams kept on her high heels during the orgy. With so many bodies in such close proximity in that scene, it would seem to be dangerous to keep those shoes on. Wardrobe/Make-Up Grade: B-.
The lighting was fairly average with only one of two brief gaffes. Lighting Grade: B.
Sound quality was consistent throughout the feature. The score during the Jerry Butler/Nina Hartley sex scene was a bit odd. Sound Grade: B+.
The directing was relatively poor, since the incongruities within the narrative should not have remained in the final cut. Additionally, characters would enter scenes without any sense of reality. No knocking or answering of doors. Characters just appeared. Directing Grade: D.
Overall, the premise had promise, but the poor execution ruined what could have been a great sexual drama. Artistic Merit Grade: D.
OVERALL GRADE: C.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
|
|
To link to this blog (Skip98225) use [blog Skip98225] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
11
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
